Orna Almogi. Rong-zom-pa’s Discourses on Buddhology: A Study of Various Conceptions of Buddhahood in Indian Sources with Special Reference to the Controversy Surrounding the Existence of Gnosis (ye shes: jñāna) as Presented by the Eleventh-Century Tibetan Scholar Rong-zom Chos-kyi-bzang-po. Studia Philologica Buddhica: Monograph Series XXIV. Tokyo: The International Institute for Buddhist Studies, 2009.
• Available from the International College for Postgraduate Buddhist Studies Library, International Institute for Buddhist Studies, Tokyo.
Part OneIntroduction |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Chapter 1: |
Rong-zom-pa’s Discussion of the Controversy Surrounding the Constituents of Buddhahood: An Overview |
23 |
|||||
|
|
1. |
Introductory Remarks |
23 |
||||
|
|
2. |
Various Positions regarding the Constituents of Buddhahood |
25 |
||||
|
|
3. |
The Conceptions of Buddhahood Contained in Various Scriptural Systems |
27 |
||||
|
|
4. |
The Buddhist Doxographical Systems and Schools as the Basis of the Various Positions |
33 |
||||
|
|
A. |
Three Incorrect Positions regarding the Substratum of Appearances |
34 |
||||
|
|
(i) |
Undisputed (rtsod gzhi med pa) Positions |
35 |
||||
|
|
(ii) |
Disputed (rtsod gzhi bcas pa) Positions |
36 |
||||
|
|
B. |
The Fourth and Correct Position regarding the Substratum of Appearances |
37 |
||||
|
|
5. |
Discussions of the Issue Found in Other Works of Rong-zom-pa |
38 |
||||
|
|
6. |
Concluding Remarks |
43 |
||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Chapter 2: |
Buddhology in Its Historical and Philosophical Context: An Overview |
45 |
|||||
|
|
1. |
Introductory Remarks |
45 |
||||
|
|
2. |
Non-Mahāyāna Buddhology |
47 |
||||
|
|
A. |
Nirvāṇa without Remains and the Indirect Activities of the Buddha in the World |
47 |
||||
|
|
B. |
The Notions of Transcendental and Multiple Buddhas and Their Fields |
51 |
||||
|
|
3. |
Non-Tantric Mahāyāna Buddhology |
53 |
||||
|
|
A. |
The True Nature of the World as Nirvāṇa and the Inconceivability of Buddhahood |
56 |
||||
|
|
B. |
Buddhahood as Defined by Qualities and the Notion of Unfixed Nirvāṇa |
57 |
||||
|
|
C. |
The Theory of the Three Kāyas |
61 |
||||
|
|
D. |
The Four Gnoses |
68 |
||||
|
|
E. |
The Notion of Bliss |
70 |
||||
|
|
4. |
Tantric Buddhology |
76 |
||||
|
|
A. |
Mantras, Vidyās, and Dhāraṇīs |
81 |
||||
|
|
B. |
Mudrās |
88 |
||||
|
|
C. |
Manifold Expressions of Buddhahood |
106 |
||||
|
|
(i) |
Multiple Bodies |
108 |
||||
|
|
(ii) |
Multiple Gnoses |
114 |
||||
|
|
(iii) |
MultipleBuddha Families |
119 |
||||
|
|
D. |
The Notion of Ādibuddha |
125 |
||||
|
|
E. |
Wrathful Manifestations |
128 |
||||
|
|
F. |
Maṇḍalas |
130 |
||||
|
|
G. |
The Notion of Great Bliss |
134 |
||||
|
|
5. |
Concluding Remarks |
137 |
||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Chapter 3: |
The Controversy Surrounding the Existence of |
139 |
|||||
|
|
1. |
Introductory Remarks |
139 |
||||
|
|
2. |
The Problem of Ascribing a Mental Element to the Absolute |
139 |
||||
|
|
3. |
The Mental Element of the Absolute and Yogācāra Theories of Knowledge |
142 |
||||
|
|
4. |
A Buddha’s Knowledge (jñāna: ye shes): A Brief Discussion of the Key Terms |
160 |
||||
|
|
A. |
On the Tibetan Term ye shes |
160 |
||||
|
|
B. |
Non-conceptual Gnosis and Pure Mundane Gnosis |
163 |
||||
|
|
5. |
Unfixed Nirvāṇa: The Absolute and Its Activity in the World |
171 |
||||
|
|
6. |
The Various Positions and Their Proponents |
176 |
||||
|
|
A. |
Indian Authors |
177 |
||||
|
|
|
(i) | Proponents of the Purified Dharmadhātu as the Sole Constituent of Buddhahood (Position 1) |
177 |
|||
|
|
|
(a) | *Madhyamaka-Siṃha |
177 |
|||
|
|
|
(b) | Mañjuśrīmitra |
178 |
|||
|
|
|
(c) | Atiśa |
179 |
|||
|
|
|
(d) | Candraharipāda |
180 |
|||
|
|
|
(e) | Bhavya |
180 |
|||
|
|
(ii) |
Proponents of the Existence of the Purified Dharmadhātu and Non-Conceptual Gnosis (Position 2) |
181 |
||||
|
|
|
(a) | Nāgamitra and Jñānacandra |
181 |
|||
|
|
|
(b) | Dharmamitra |
182 |
|||
|
|
(iii) |
Proponents of the Existence of Pure Mundane Gnosis (Positions 3–6) |
184 |
||||
|
|
|
(a) | Śrīgupta |
184 |
|||
|
|
B. |
Tibetan Authors up until the Eleventh or Early
Twelfth Century |
185 |
||||
|
|
|
(a) | Ye-shes-sde |
185 |
|||
|
|
|
(b) | Gro-lung-pa |
186 |
|||
|
|
|
(c) | sGam-po-pa |
186 |
|||
|
|
7. |
Concluding Remarks |
187 |
||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Chapter 4: |
Rong-zom-pa’s Position on Whether Gnosis Exists at the Stage of a Buddha |
189 |
|||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
1. |
Introductory Remarks |
189 |
||||
|
|
2. |
Rong-zom-pa’s View regarding the Existence of Gnosis at the Stage of a Buddha as Addressed by Mi-pham |
193 |
||||
|
|
A. |
The Main Points of Mi-pham’s Argumentation |
193 |
||||
|
|
B. |
Mi-pham’s Discussion: A Translation |
199 |
||||
|
|
3. |
Self-occurring Gnosis |
206 |
||||
|
|
A. |
Occurrences of the Term in Indian Sources |
206 |
||||
|
|
B. |
Rong-zom-pa on Self-occurring Gnosis |
215 |
||||
|
|
4. |
Rong-zom-pa on How the Buddhas Act |
220 |
||||
|
|
5. |
Rong-zom-pa’s Madhyamaka Affiliation |
226 |
||||
|
|
6. |
Concluding Remarks |
232 |
||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Part TwoAnnotated Translations |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
A Note on the Annotated Translations |
235 |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
The Sangs rgyas kyi sa chen mo |
237 |
||||||
|
|
1. |
An Outline of the Text |
237 |
||||
|
|
2. |
An Annotated Translation |
239 |
||||
|
|
|||||||
|
The Discussion in the dKon cog ’grel |
277 |
||||||
|
|
1. |
An Outline of the Text |
277 |
||||
|
|
2. |
An Annotated Translation |
278 |
||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Works by Indian Authors |
299 |
||||||
|
|
1. |
Proponents of the Purified Dharmadhātu as the Sole Constituent of Buddhahood |
299 |
||||
|
|
A. |
*Madhyamaka-Siṃha’s Dṛṣṭivibhāga |
299 |
||||
|
|
B. |
Mañjuśrīmitra’s Bodhicittabhāvanānirdeśa |
306 |
||||
|
|
C. |
Atiśa’s Ekasmṛtyupadeśa |
310 |
||||
|
|
D. |
Candraharipāda’s Ratnamālā |
311 |
||||
|
|
E. |
Bhavya’s Madhyamakapradīpa |
315 |
||||
|
|
2. |
Proponents of the Existence of the Purified Dharmadhātu and Non-Conceptual Gnosis |
319 |
||||
|
|
A. |
Nāgamitra’s Kāyatrayāvatāramukha and Jñānacandra’s Commentary, the Kāyatrayavṛtti |
319 |
||||
|
|
B. |
Dharmamitra’s Prasphuṭapadā |
336 |
||||
|
|
3. |
Proponents of the Existence of Pure Mundane Gnosis |
341 |
||||
|
|
A. |
Śrīgupta’s Tattvāvatāravṛtti |
341 |
||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Works by Tibetan Authors |
343 |
||||||
|
|
1. |
Ye-shes-sde’s lTa ba’i khyad par |
343 |
||||
|
|
2. |
Gro-lung-pa’s bsTan rim chen mo |
347 |
||||
|
|
3. |
sGam-po-pa’s Thar rgyan |
352 |
||||
|
|
|||||||
Part ThreeThe Tibetan Texts: Critical Editions |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
| Introductory Remarks on the Critical Editions |
363 |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Tibetan Texts Cited in the Introduction |
367 |
||||||
|
|
1. |
Passages Cited in Chapter Two |
367 |
||||
|
|
2. |
Passages Cited in Chapter Four |
383 |
||||
|
|
|||||||
|
The Sangs rgyas kyi sa chen mo |
391 |
||||||
|
|
1. |
A Note on the Edition |
391 |
||||
|
|
2. |
A Critical Edition |
392 |
||||
|
|
|||||||
|
The Discussion in the dKon cog ’grel |
411 |
||||||
|
|
1. |
A Note on the Edition |
411 |
||||
|
|
2. |
A Critical Edition |
413 |
||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Works by Indian Authors |
425 |
||||||
|
|
1. |
Proponents of the Purified Dharmadhātu as the |
425 |
||||
|
|
A. |
*Madhyamaka-Siṃha’s Dṛṣṭivibhāga |
425 |
||||
|
|
B. |
Mañjuśrīmitra’s Bodhicittabhāvanānirdeśa |
430 |
||||
|
|
C. |
Atiśa’s Ekasmṛtyupadeśa |
435 |
||||
|
|
D. |
Candraharipāda’s Ratnamālā |
436 |
||||
|
|
E. |
Bhavya’s Madhyamakapradīpa |
438 |
||||
|
|
2. |
Proponents of the Existence of the Purified Dharmadhātu and Non-Conceptual Gnosis |
440 |
||||
|
|
A. |
Nāgamitra’s Kāyatrayāvatāramukha and Jñānacandra’s Commentary, the Kāyatrayavṛtti |
440 |
||||
|
|
B. |
Dharmamitra’s Prasphuṭapadā |
453 |
||||
|
|
3. |
Proponents of the Existence of Pure Mundane Gnosis |
455 |
||||
|
|
A. |
Śrīgupta’s Tattvāvatāravṛtti |
455 |
||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Works by Tibetan Authors |
457 |
||||||
|
|
1. |
Ye-shes-sde’s lTa ba’i khyad par |
457 |
||||
|
|
2. |
Gro-lung-pa’s bsTan rim chen mo |
460 |
||||
|
|
3. |
sGam-po-pa’s Thar rgyan |
463 |
||||
|
|
|||||||
Appendix |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Klong-chen-pa’s Presentation of Various Conceptions of Buddhahood in His Yid kyi mun sel |
475 |
||||||
|
|
1. |
Introductory Remarks |
475 |
||||
|
|
2. |
A Translation |
478 |
||||
|
|
3. |
The Tibetan Text |
482 |
||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
Abbreviations and Bibliography |
485 |
||||||
|
|
1. |
Sigla Used in the Critical Editions and in Citations of Tibetan Texts |
485 |
||||
|
|
2. |
Journals, Collections, Series, and Institutes |
486 |
||||
|
|
3. |
Primary Sources: Indian Works |
487 |
||||
|
|
4. |
Primary Sources: Tibetan Works |
500 |
||||
|
|
5. |
Secondary Sources |
507 |
||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
Index |
527 |
||||||